At AllFaith.com I share numerous studies into the world's religions based on my personal quest for Truth. Over the years this research has led me to embrace Judaism. That is now the main focus of the domain.
On my blogs I share many of these studies and invite your questions and comments.
Also see my Xanga Blog.
"Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand!
...Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints" -- Eph 6:13, 18
As people of faith we're commanded to resist evil, to hinder it and to do our best to overcome it. Never before in history has the lament been more true: The harvest is great, but the workers are few.
Will you join the spiritual resistance?
In this study we'll examine one important aspect of spiritual resistance: The Will and the Word as employed by the Hinderers. The concept is actually simple but requires effort to perfect.
Hinderers are those folks who stand in opposition to evil. The Will and the Word is one aspect of their resistance.
For clarity sake I should mention at the outset that the term should not be construed to suggest any form of Sorcery despite the shared use of the term.
The Role of the Hinderers:
The Scripture says
Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what hinders that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now hinders will continue to hinder, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming. -- II Thess 2:5-8 (New Scofield KJV)
The word hinder here is Katecho, a Greek verb meaning "to restrain or hinder (the course or progress of a thing).
A more literal translation has this verse as:
Do ye not remember that, being yet with you, these things I said to you? and now, what is keeping down ye have known, for his being revealed in his own time, for the secret of the lawlessness doth already work, only he who is keeping down now [will hinder] -- till he may be out of the way, and then shall be revealed the Lawless One, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the manifestation of his presence -- Young's literal translation.
The Identity of the Hinderers:
The text as we have it speaks of the Hinderer as a single being, much as the Tanach often references the Jewish people as "My Servant" singular and the New Testament calls the Church the (singular) Bride of Christ, even though both groups number in the millions. In the same the Hinderers are many yet One.
There are some knowledgeable biblical commentators who believe the Hinderer is the Holy Spirit (Ruach ha Kodesh). This belief is generally based on the Nicean doctrine of the Holy Trinity, which I discuss elsewhere. In context however this can not be so because were the Spirit of God ever removed from the earth the earth would cease to exist (Acts 17:28 etc). It is only the omnipresence of the Holy One that makes existence possible.
According to the clear word of the prophets, the Hinderers will largely be slaughtered during the reign of the coming global despot. While the Spirit of God will never depart the world, the Hinderers will in this way be removed from the earth:
And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth? And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled. -- Rev 6:9-11.
The Hinderers are therefore willing martyrs who hinder the workings of the spirit of antichrist, especially those serving in our generation who are consciously restraining the rise of the Rex Mundi and his New World Order.
The Scripture says:
Surely, whenever and at whatever time righteousness declines, O descendant of Bharata, and there occurs a predominance of unrighteousness, at that time I manifest Myself. In order to deliver saintly people, to destroy the wicked and to firmly reestablish religious principles, I appear age after age. -- Bhagavad Gita 4:7,8
Hinderers are those who serve the One God in diverse ways and who pray for His timely intervention for the good of all living entities. At the same time they work to postpone that intervention in order to give as many people as possible the opportunity to both prepare and decide which side they are on.
Most people have now decided. Most will embrace the New World Order and the coming Rex Mundi, as the Prophets foretold. The Hinderers are the exceptions to the rule. They come from all religious and philosophical systems and act according to the Light they have been granted. They are committed to standing against the encroaching Darkness whatever the cost. In this way they are like father Noah or Manu, warning the world of coming disaster and being largely ignored.
Here's a news report on the best known of the law suits. The You Tube cover looks like the old video because the reference the info on that video in the piece. First I will post the news coverage, then I'll re-post the older video. They will look alike until you click them, but they are two different vids:
According to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party upon whom requests for admissions have been served must respond, within 30 days, or else the matters in the requests will be automatically deemed conclusively admitted for purposes of the pending action.
On September 15, as part of his federal lawsuit contending that the Illinois senator is ineligible, pursuant to the U.S. Constitution, to serve as president of the United States, Philadelphia attorney Philip Berg served Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee with just such a request. Soon thereafter, on October 6, Barack Obama and the DNC acknowledged service in their motion for protective order, filed in an attempt to persuade the court to stay discovery. The Federal Rules require that a response to a request for admissions be served within the 30-day time limit, and Barack Obama and the DNC have not done so.
A motion requesting an immediate order deeming his request for admissions served upon Barack Obama and the DNC on September 15 admitted by default, and
A motion requesting an expedited ruling and/or hearing on Berg’s motion deeming the request for admissions served upon Obama and the DNC admitted.
Berg contends that the failure to respond and serve the response within the time limit is "damning," and made two appearances overnight on Rollye James' talk radio program, the second one coming shortly after midnight, during which he disclosed the meat of today's filings and the legal and political ramifications of the defendants' failure to respond.
“They did not file answers or objections or anything else to the request for admissions we served upon them on September 15,” Berg said to me shortly before midnight, noting that Obama and the DNC did in fact acknowledge service of the admission in their motion for protective order. “They knew the admissions were due. They knew they must object or answer specifically in 30 days. Here, they did nothing.”
Typically, requests can be used to ascertain three types of information: (1) the veracity of facts, (2) the authenticity of documents, or (3) the “application of law to fact.” Pretty much anything not privileged is fair game, and while the idea behind such a request is to obtain information, requests for admissions of facts and of the genuine nature of documents are generally not designed as a part of discovery, per se, but rather more of a mechanism used to whittle down proof later in the proceedings.
Unless permitted by the court or allowed pursuant to a written agreement between the parties, the party served with the request must serve a response within 30 days. How serious is a failure to respond? This, from PreTrial, by Thomas A. Mauet:
The automatic provision of Rule 36 makes it a formidable weapon because inertia or inattentiveness can have an automatic, and usually devastating, consequence. Hence, there is one cardinal rule for practice under this provision: Make sure you respond and serve the response within the 30-day period.
Given the "usually devastating" consequence of failure to respond in time to a request for admissions such as those served upon Obama and the DNC on September 15, just what were some of the admissions that Berg asserts Barack Obama and the DNC have, at least procedurally, admitted to?
Admit you were born in Kenya.
Admit you are a Kenya “natural born” citizen.
Admit your foreign birth was registered in the State of Hawaii.
Admit your father, Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr., admitted Paternity of you.
Admit your mother gave birth to you in Mombosa, Kenya.
Admit your mother’s maiden name is Stanley Ann Dunham a/k/a Ann Dunham.
Admit the COLB [Certification of Live Birth] posted on the website “Fightthesmears.com” is a forgery.
Admit you were adopted by a Foreign Citizen.
Admit you were adopted by Lolo Soetoro, M.A. a citizen of Indonesia.
Admit you were not born in Hawaii.
Admit you are a citizen of Indonesia.
Admit you never took the “Oath of Allegiance” to regain your U.S. Citizenship status.
Admit you are not a “natural born” United States citizen.
Admit your senior campaign staff is aware you are not a “natural born” United States Citizen.
Admit the United States Constitution does not allow for a Person to hold the office of President of the United States unless that person is a “natural born” United States citizen.
Admit you are ineligible pursuant to the United States Constitution to serve as President and/or Vice President of the United States.
This is, however, by no means a slam dunk for Philip Berg, as there are several options for Barack Obama and the DNC at this point. The first, and most obvious, is the seemingly watertight argument that pursuant to Rule 26(f), a request for admission may only be served after the conference for the purpose of planning discovery detailed under that rule, and therefore the 30-day time limit on Berg's request has not yet begun. Here, though, Berg could feasibly argue either that the request for admissions is not a true discovery mechanism and is actually meant to streamline the future need for discovery, or that the defendants' acknowledged service of the request in their October 6 motion for protective order and failed, at that time, to specifically object or answer. The second option for the defense, somewhat related to the first, is that the motion for protective order rendered the requests null and void, but Berg may argue that the protective order effectively staying discovery was never issued by the court. Yet another option, still easily foreseen, is that Obama and the DNC could file a motion to withdraw admissions which have been deemed admitted. In order to file a motion to withdraw admissions deemed admitted by default, a party must show (1) "good cause" regarding why there was no response and (2) that such a motion to withdraw would not cause undue prejudice to the plaintiff. Here, Berg could contend that Obama and the DNC failed to meet those standards, that they cannot show "good cause" for failing to answer or object, and that withdrawing the admissions would cause undue prejudice.
Still, for Berg, the issue is clear. He simply wanted answers or objections, he said, and instead received nothing. Rule 36, according to Berg, is fairly cut-and-dry.
"It all comes down to the fact that there's nothing from the other side," Berg said. "The admissions are there. By not filing the answers or objections, the defense has admitted everything. He admits he was born in Kenya. He admits he was adopted in Indonesia. He admits that the documentation posted online is a phony. And he admits that he is constitutionally ineligible to serve as president of the United States."
For more information and background on Philip Berg's civil action against Barack Obama and the Democratic National Committee, look to the right-hand side of the America's Right page for the list of related articles, updates and commentaries under the "BERG v. OBAMA @ AMERICA'S RIGHT" heading.
Today, Black Friday, begins the holiday shopping season. This shopping season, as millions of Americans fill their local stores and malls, please take a moment to help Burma.
We need people all across the country to go into their local jewelry stories and find out which ones still carry "Burma Blood Rubies." Similar to how "Blood Diamonds" fueled civil war in Sierra Leone and other African countries, "Blood Rubies" support the Burmese regime's campaign of ethnic cleansing against Burma's minorities and brutal repression of peaceful monks and democracy activists.
While we are asking you to be a "secret" shopper, in reality there is nothing "secret" about this effort. We simply want you to inquire at jewelry stores in your area if they continue to sell Burmese rubies. Also, it is not a "secret" that there are many good reasons not to buy "Burma Blood Rubies". Here are a few:
According to a leading expert, the trade in Burmese gems brings the regime up to $526 million in revenue per year.
Nobel Peace Prize recipient Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of Burma's struggle for democracy, has called for companies to cut ties to Burma to prevent the Burmese military regime from receiving money from unsuspecting consumers.
Burma's ruby mining industry is wrought with human rights abuses. The areas surrounding the mines are plagued by "rampant land confiscation, extortion, forced labor, child labor, environmental pollution, and unsafe working conditions for miners. HIV/AIDS, drug-resistance malaria, and tuberculosis are increasingly common in mining areas" as well.
Some rubies may have been imported in violation of the "Block Burmese JADE Act" which went into effect on October 26th, 2008. The legislation fills an important loophole in previous laws, by banning the import of all Burmese rubies that were processed in third countries.
For more background on "Burma's Blood Rubies," and our campaign to find out which stores are still selling them, click here.
Take Action: We hope that you can help us, and the people of Burma, here is a link to instructionson how to help.
Sincerely,
Aung Din, Jeremy Woodrum, Jennifer Quigley, Jacqui Pilch, and Mike Haack
Support 1991 Nobel Peace Prize recipient Aung San Suu Kyi and the struggle for freedom and democracy in Burma:
Shariah, or Islamic law, may be spreading around the world, but it isn't going to be established in the United States without opposition, vow members of the United American Committee.
Officials with the non-profit have erected a 48-foot-long billboard just outside of Detroit, home to one of the largest groups of Muslims in the U.S.
"SHARIA LAW THREATENS AMERICA," warns the sign.
The UAC says it's "dedicated to awakening the nation to the threats of radical Islam" and works to "educate Americans on the nature of Islamic extremism."
The group's mission is to battle against "the ideological aspects of the war on terror to counter elements of radical Islam in America."
"Shariah law is a legal system recognized in many Islamic countries such as the former Taliban regime of Afghanistan, and currently Saudi Arabia, and is a legal system which dictates beheadings, stonings, and other punishments for what are listed as crimes under Shariah such as homosexuality and adultery, and according to critics views women as inferior granting them little rights," the organization stated.
Tom Trento, a spokesman, said, "Muslims are the biggest victims of Shariah law in the world. We hope this message inspires the Muslims of America who came to this country to escape Shariah to stand up against it."
The organization's website, whose address is featured on the billboard, highlights a video of Wafa Sultan, a Syrian Muslim who escaped the Middle East and has become a fierce critic of Islam and Shariah.
"At times, it feels to me that Shariah is following me to the United States," Sultan says in the video, referring to radical Islamic charities and organizations operating in the U.S.
Sultan also points out that in Britain and France Shariah is being enforced in various ways in certain communities. Britain recently sanctioned the establishment of Shariah courts for civil matters among Muslims, the UAC noted.
"Our Constitution is not compatible with Shariah," Sultan said. Under the religious rules, "Women and children are deprived of rights we in the West take for granted."
"Homeless in America is more attractive to me than living as a woman under Shariah," she added. "I don’t want to face again the hell that I had kicked off 20 years ago. My biggest obligation is to preserve the free spirit of this wonderful country and not allow destructive forces to ruin it."
The UAC billboard is in Luna Pier, 10 miles north of Toledo and 20 miles south of Detroit on Interstate 75, officials said.
The announcement about the sign comes as Islam expert Daniel Pipes warns in a report in the Jerusalem Post Shariah is advancing one step at a time into Western Europe and North America.
Pipes cited the recent case of a Scottish judge who "bent" the law to acknowledge a polygamous household, a status allowed under Shariah.
"The case involved a Muslim male who drove 64 miles per hour in a 30 mph zone – usually grounds for an automatic loss of one's driving license. The defendant's lawyer explained his client's need to speed: 'He has one wife in Motherwell and another in Glasgow and sleeps with one one night and stays with the other the next on an alternate basis. Without his driving license he would be unable to do this on a regular basis,'" Pipes reported.
"Sympathetic to the polygamist's plight, the judge permitted him to retain his license," he said.
The report said the ruling suggests monogamy, "long a foundation of Western civilization, is silently eroding under the challenge of Islamic law."
Pipes reported at least six Western jurisdictions now accept harems, including Britain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Australia and Canada. Canada, for example, acknowledges "a marriage that is actually or potentially polygamous, if it was celebrated in a jurisdiction whose system of law recognizes it as valid."
WND reported just days ago a Heritage Foundation expert's warning the U.S. also needs to maintain active opposition to plans for "religious anti-defamation" laws both within its borders and on an international scale or face consequences.
In a report published on the foundation's website, Steven Groves said the U.S. "must remain wary of continuing efforts by U.N. member states to gain wider acceptance of the 'defamation of religions' concept." The proposal primarily targets any criticism of Islam.
Proponents "will continue to push the 'defamation of religions' agenda at the U.N. Human Rights Council, the U.N. General Assembly, and at other international forums such as the April 2009 Durban Review Conference," Groves warned.
Groves is the Heritage Foundation's Bernard and Barbara Lomas Fellow in the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, a division of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for International Studies.
He also said within its own borders, the U.S. should refuse to recognize "a new legal cause of action that bans insults or criticism of religion," because it would provide no benefit whatsoever.
States already have laws to condemn religious discrimination and prosecute acts of incitement to violence, he argued. The federal government "should tread extremely lightly where disputes over religious doctrine are concerned. The U.S. does not need a national speech code that would restrict the First Amendment rights of Americans, no matter how offensive that speech may be to any particular religious denomination."
Groves cited the 2005 attempt by Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., who wanted to require that the Islamic holy book, the Quran, be treated with "dignity and respect."
"Any attempt to establish a criminal or civil 'defamation of religions' law in the United States … must be strongly opposed," Groves said. "Attempts to introduce such legislation may be incremental – notably, in May 2005, when a group of U.S. congressmen sponsored a resolution," he said. "Such piecemeal legislation must be closely guarded against."
WND also has reported the Treasury Department has announced it will teach "Islamic finance" to U.S. banking regulatory agencies, Congress and other parts of the executive branch.
According to its announcement, the "Islamic Finance 101" forum is "designed to help inform the policy community about Islamic financial services, which are an increasingly important part of the global financial industry."
Revealingly, a recent report in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium online newsletter published by the founder of WND, said Britain's MI6 intelligence service identified a group that raises funds with impunity in London as the organization whose militia members in Somalia imposed a Shariah death sentence on a 13-year-old rape victim.
The report describes how the group recently imposed the brutal punishment on a child in the Somalian town of Kismayo.
A 13-year-old girl, described in an intelligence report as "little more than a pretty child," was sentenced to be stoned to death by the all-male court.
It imposed the sentence on Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow after she had complained to the local Shariah court that she had been gang-raped by, among others, her cousins.
But the court found her guilty of adultery and sentenced her to death by stoning.
She was taken from the courthouse to a local sports stadium. There she was buried up to her neck in sand and then stoned in front of a 1,000-strong crowd.
As we await the three pending Obama decisions of the US Supreme Court As the Electoral College prepares to declare Barack Hussein Obama President Elect (he still isn't!) As the Muslim Brotherhood death toll continues to rise in Mumbai (currently 146 with another 324 injured)....
Most Americans have seemingly gone back to sleep...
Nonetheless, the fact remains that to date there is STILL no evidence that:
Barack Hussein Obama was born in the USA (and hence eligible to be president) Barack Hussein Obama is an American citizen (rather than a citizen of Indonesia) That the US Constitution is anything more than "a GD piece of paper" as Dictator Bush said.
(I went to the Washington Times looking for this and didn't find it but this blog tends to be solid -- thanks for the heads up Jenny -- its also referenced here and at other places).
Of course... IF Obama is disqualified before he takes office that means McCain becomes president (unless the riots and other other issues keep Bush in power) and we now know that McCain deceived us. He is on "the same page" as Obama:
Click Here For More On This on my previous blog entry
None the less we NEED to know the truth! None the less we NEED to stop the Muslim Brotherhood Project:
The Muslim Brotherhood Project
The Muslim Brotherhood “Project”
This is What Is Being Planned for us all:
In light of Mumbai maybe we will FINALLY wake up!!!
Probably not...
I was told by my former imam and have had it confirmed by numerous other Muslims that "the Project" exists. The Muslim Brotherhood itself is well known of course. This Muslim Brotherhood “Project”fits what I was told perfectly and I believe it is true and accurate.
The end result of this project, I was told, is that "within 100 years public schools in the US will close for Ramadan and your children will come to the masjid for Friday prayers. The plan is real. If you do not wish to live under Sharia law it is imperative that you support Israel and demand the US to withdraw all troops from all Muslim lands immediately and prepare for the coming revolution within our own borders.
One might be led to think that if international law enforcement authorities and Western intelligence agencies had discovered a twenty-year old document revealing a top-secret plan developed by the oldest Islamist organization with one of the most extensive terror networks in the world to launch a program of “cultural invasion” and eventual conquest of the West that virtually mirrors the tactics used by Islamists for more than two decades, that such news would scream from headlines published on the front pages and above the fold of the New York Times, Washington Post, London Times, Le Monde, Bild, and La Repubblica.
If that’s what you might think, you would be wrong.
In fact, such a document was recovered in a raid by Swiss authorities in November 2001, two months after the horror of 9/11. Since that time information about this document, known in counterterrorism circles as “The Project”, and discussion regarding its content has been limited to the top-secret world of Western intelligence communities. Only through the work of an intrepid Swiss journalist, Sylvain Besson of Le Temps, and his book published in October 2005 in France, La conquête de l’Occident: Le projet secret des Islamistes (The Conquest of the West: The Islamists’ Secret Project), has information regarding The Project finally been made public. One Western official cited by Besson has described The Project as “a totalitarian ideology of infiltration which represents, in the end, the greatest danger for European societies.”
Now FrontPage readers will be the first to be able to read the complete English translation of The Project.
What Western intelligence authorities know about The Project begins with the raid of a luxurious villa in Campione, Switzerland on November 7, 2001. The target of the raid was Youssef Nada, director of the Al-Taqwa Bank of Lugano, who has had active association with the Muslim Brotherhood for more than 50 years and who admitted to being one of the organization’s international leaders. The Muslim Brotherhood, regarded as the oldest and one of the most important Islamist movements in the world, was founded by Hasan al-Banna in 1928 and dedicated to the credo, “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”
The raid was conducted by Swiss law enforcement at the request of the White House in the initial crackdown on terrorist finances in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. US and Swiss investigators had been looking at Al-Taqwa’s involvement in money laundering and funding a wide range of Islamic terrorist groups, including Al-Qaeda, HAMAS (the Palestinian affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood), the Algerian GIA, and the Tunisian Ennahdah.
Included in the documents seized during the raid of Nada’s Swiss villa was a 14-page plan written in Arabic and dated December 1, 1982, which outlines a 12-point strategy to “establish an Islamic government on earth” – identified as The Project. According to testimony given to Swiss authorities by Nada, the unsigned document was prepared by “Islamic researchers” associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
What makes The Project so different from the standard “Death of America! Death to Israel!” and “Establish the global caliphate!” Islamist rhetoric is that it represents a flexible, multi-phased, long-term approach to the “cultural invasion” of the West. Calling for the utilization of various tactics, ranging from immigration, infiltration, surveillance, propaganda, protest, deception, political legitimacy and terrorism, The Project has served for more than two decades as the Muslim Brotherhood “master plan”. As can be seen in a number of examples throughout Europe – including the political recognition of parallel Islamist government organizations in Sweden, the recent “cartoon” jihad in Denmark, the Parisian car-burning intifada last November, and the 7/7 terrorist attacks in London – the plan outlined in The Project has been overwhelmingly successful.
Rather than focusing on terrorism as the sole method of group action, as is the case with Al-Qaeda, in perfect postmodern fashion the use of terror falls into a multiplicity of options available to progressively infiltrate, confront, and eventually establish Islamic domination over the West. The following tactics and techniques are among the many recommendations made in The Project:
- Networking and coordinating actions between likeminded Islamist organizations;
- Avoiding open alliances with known terrorist organizations and individuals to maintain the appearance of “moderation”;
- Infiltrating and taking over existing Muslim organizations to realign them towards the Muslim Brotherhood’s collective goals;
- Using deception to mask the intended goals of Islamist actions, as long as it doesn’t conflict with shari’a law;
- Avoiding social conflicts with Westerners locally, nationally or globally, that might damage the long-term ability to expand the Islamist powerbase in the West or provoke a lash back against Muslims;
- Establishing financial networks to fund the work of conversion of the West, including the support of full-time administrators and workers;
- Conducting surveillance, obtaining data, and establishing collection and data storage capabilities;
- Putting into place a watchdog system for monitoring Western media to warn Muslims of “international plots fomented against them”;
- Cultivating an Islamist intellectual community, including the establishment of think-tanks and advocacy groups, and publishing “academic” studies, to legitimize Islamist positions and to chronicle the history of Islamist movements;
- Developing a comprehensive 100-year plan to advance Islamist ideology throughout the world;
- Balancing international objectives with local flexibility;
- Building extensive social networks of schools, hospitals and charitable organizations dedicated to Islamist ideals so that contact with the movement for Muslims in the West is constant;
- Involving ideologically committed Muslims in democratically-elected institutions on all levels in the West, including government, NGOs, private organizations and labor unions;
- Instrumentally using existing Western institutions until they can be converted and put into service of Islam;
- Drafting Islamic constitutions, laws and policies for eventual implementation;
- Avoiding conflict within the Islamist movements on all levels, including the development of processes for conflict resolution;
- Instituting alliances with Western “progressive” organizations that share similar goals;
- Creating autonomous “security forces” to protect Muslims in the West;
- Inflaming violence and keeping Muslims living in the West “in a jihad frame of mind”;
- Supporting jihad movements across the Muslim world through preaching, propaganda, personnel, funding, and technical and operational support;
- Making the Palestinian cause a global wedge issue for Muslims;
- Adopting the total liberation of Palestine from Israel and the creation of an Islamic state as a keystone in the plan for global Islamic domination;
- Instigating a constant campaign to incite hatred by Muslims against Jews and rejecting any discussions of conciliation or coexistence with them;
- Actively creating jihad terror cells within Palestine;
- Linking the terrorist activities in Palestine with the global terror movement;
- Collecting sufficient funds to indefinitely perpetuate and support jihad around the world;
In reading The Project, it should be kept in mind that it was drafted in 1982 when current tensions and terrorist activities in the Middle East were still very nascent. In many respects, The Project is extremely prescient for outlining the bulk of Islamist action, whether by “moderate” Islamist organizations or outright terror groups, over the past two decades.
At present, most of what is publicly known about The Project is the result of Sylvain Besson’s investigative work, including his book and a related article published last October in the Swiss daily, Le Temps, L’islamisme à la conquête du monde (Islamism and the Conquest of the World), profiling his book, which is only available in a French-language edition. At least one Egyptian newspaper, Al-Mussawar, published the entire Arabic text of The Project last November.
In the English-language press, the attention paid to Besson’s revelation of The Project has been almost non-existent. The only mention found in a mainstream media publication in the US has been as a secondary item in an article in the Weekly Standard (February 20, 2006) by Olivier Guitta, The Cartoon Jihad. The most extensive commentary on The Project has been by an American researcher and journalist living in London, Scott Burgess, who has posted his analysis of the document on his blog, The Daily Ablution. Along with his commentary, an English translation of the French text of The Project was serialized in December (Parts I, II, III, IV, V, Conclusion). The complete English translation prepared by Mr. Burgess is presented in its entirety here with his permission.
The lack of public discussion about The Project notwithstanding, the document and the plan it outlines has been the subject of considerable discussion amongst the Western intelligence agencies. One US counterterrorism official who spoke with Besson about The Project, and who is cited in Guitta’s Weekly Standard article, is current White House terrorism czar, Juan Zarate. Calling The Project a Muslim Brotherhood master plan for “spreading their political ideology,” Zarate expressed concerns to Besson because “the Muslim Brotherhood is a group that worries us not because it deals with philosophical or ideological ideas but because it defends the use of violence against civilians.”
One renowned international scholar of Islamist movements who also spoke with Besson, Reuven Paz, talked about The Project in its historical context:
The Project was part of the charter of the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was official established on July 29, 1982. It reflects a vast plan which was revived in the 1960s, with the immigration of Brotherhood intellectuals, principally Syrian and Egyptians, into Europe.
As Paz notes, The Project was drafted by the Muslim Brotherhood as part of its rechartering process in 1982, a time that marks an upswing in its organizational expansion internationally, as well as a turning point in the alternating periods of repression and toleration by the Egyptian government. In 1952, the organization played a critical support role to the Free Officers Movement led by Gamal Abdul Nasser, which overthrew King Faruq, but quickly fell out of favor with the new revolutionary regime because of Nasser’s refusal to follow the Muslim Brotherhood’s call to institute an ideologically committed Islamic state. At various times since the July Revolution in 1952, the Brotherhood has regularly been banned and its leaders killed and imprisoned by Egyptian authorities.
Since it was rechartered in 1982, the Muslim Brotherhood has spread its network across the Middle East, Europe, and even America. At home in Egypt, parliamentary elections in 2005 saw the Muslim Brotherhood winning 20 percent of the available legislative seats, comprising the largest opposition party block. Its Palestinian affiliate, known to the world as HAMAS, recently gained control of the Palestinian Authority after elections secured for them 74 of 132 seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council. Its Syrian branch has historically been the largest organized group opposing the Assad regime, and the organization also has affiliates in Jordan, Sudan, and Iraq. In the US, the Muslim Brotherhood is primarily represented by the Muslim American Society (MAS).
Since its formation, the Muslim Brotherhood has advocated the use of terrorism as a means of advancing its agenda of global Islamic domination. But as the largest popular radical movement in the Islamic world, it has attracted many leading Islamist intellectuals. Included among this group of Muslim Brotherhood intellectuals is Youssef Qaradawi, an Egyptian-born, Qatar-based Islamist cleric.
As one of the leading Muslim Brotherhood spiritual figures and radical Islamic preachers (who has his own weekly program on Al-Jazeera), Qaradawi has been one of the leading apologists of suicide bombings in Israel and terrorism against Western interests in the Middle East. Both Sylvain Besson and Scott Burgess provide extensive comparisons between Qaradawi’s publication, Priorities of the Islamic Movement in the Coming Phase, published in 1990, and The Project, which predates Qaradawi’s Priorities by eight years. They note the striking similarities in the language used and the plans and methods both documents advocate. It is speculated that The Project was either used by Qaradawi as a template for his own work, or that he had a hand in its drafting in 1982. Perhaps coincidentally, Qaradawi was the fourth largest shareholder in the Al-Taqwa Bank of Lugano, the director of which, Youssef Nada, was the individual in whose possession The Project was found. Since 1999, Qaradawi has been banned from entering the US as a result of his connections to terrorist organizations and his outspoken advocacy of terrorism.
For those who have read The Project, what is most troubling is not that Islamists have developed a plan for global dominance; it has been assumed by experts that Islamist organizations and terrorist groups have been operating off an agreed-upon set of general principles, networks and methodology. What is startling is how effectively the Islamist plan for conquest outlined in The Project has been implemented by Muslims in the West for more than two decades. Equally troubling is the ideology that lies behind the plan: inciting hatred and violence against Jewish populations around the world; the deliberate co-opting and subversion of Western public and private institutions; its recommendation of a policy of deliberate escalating confrontation by Muslims living in the West against their neighbors and fellow-citizens; the acceptance of terrorism as a legitimate option for achieving their ends and the inevitable reality of jihad against non-Muslims; and its ultimate goal of forcibly instituting the Islamic rule of the caliphate by shari’a in the West, and eventually the whole world.
If the experience over the past quarter of a century seen in Europe and the US is any indication, the “Islamic researchers” who drafted The Project more than two decades ago must be pleased to see their long-term plan to conquer the West and to see the Green flag of Islam raised over its citizens realized so rapidly, efficiently and completely.
If Islamists are equally successful in the years to come, Westerners ought to enjoy their personal and political freedoms while they last.
...... "I don't give a goddamn," Bush retorted. "I'm the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way." "Mr. President," one aide in the meeting said. "There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution." "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!" Source: http://www.rense.com/general69/paper.htm
2:46: Just as the benefit of a full well is negligible when the land is flooded all around, in the same way, the Vedic literature is not required by a qualified brahmana who knows the truth.
One whose intellect is bathed in this wisdom and who acts without attachment to results -- whose only goal is service to the Lord -- such a person is qualified to understand the Vedas (the Truth). Such a person is a true brahmana. Such brahmanas have attained the goal of all sacred literature and all holy rites even without study. Conversely those who tirelessly study the scriptures and perform the sacred rites out of selfish motives, being controlled by the three gunas of material nature as discussed in verse 42 above, fails to grasp the true meaning of the texts even though they commit unlimited time to study.
2:47: You certainly have every right to perform [worthy] actions, but not to the fruit thereof. Never consider the results of your actions to be your own. If you are not attached they will be as inaction.
In other words, by renouncing the results of your actions you will receive no karmic reactions at all.
2:48: Firmly established in yoga [right intention] perform your actions, giving up attachment to success and failure, O Dhananjaya [O Conqueror of Wealth]. This equanimity is called yoga.
Yoga has a great many meanings. The Sanskrit root yuj means "to yoke", "to control" or "to unite". The meaning must be ascertained from the context. In this case the Lord is telling Arjuna to maintain mental stability by controlling his mind. Such controlled equilibrium is conducive to spiritual unification.
2:49: Keep all inferior action far away, O Dhananjaya. Surrender to [or take refuge in] the yoga of intelligence [buddhi-yoga]. Only misers desire fruitive results.
Sri Krsna has previously encouraged Arjuna to renounce the results of his actions, now He points out that not all actions are equal. He says buddhi-yoga or intellectual communion with the supreme is essential. Arjuna is encouraged to use his intelligence to only engage in sattvic or high quality activities that connect him with the divine.
As the conversation continues Sri Krsna will reveal the nature of the supreme. He is leading his student step by step toward spiritual realization.
2:50: One whose intelligence is thus yoked is freed from both positive and negative reactions even in this life. Therefore in order to achieve the union of karmic balance undertake all activities as yoga for your well being.
2:51: With the intelligence yoked and abandoning the fruits born of action, the wise ones are liberated from the bondage of repeated births. They attain that platform that is free from all sinful reactions.
Actions cause reactions. Positive actions result in positive reactions just as surely as negative actions produce negative reactions. Neither is desirable for those seeking spiritual release (moksha).
Saguna Brahman (the material manifestation) operates under the laws of this karmic duality. Once the living entities enter the material realms they become subject to dualism and moment by moment, lifetime by lifetime, they accumulate ever more karmic reactions and thus become progressively bound to matter and material consciousness. Eventually these radiant sparks of the infinite -- who are eternally unfettered spirit beings -- become bound and imprisoned by material consciousness and forget their spiritual nature all together.
While in Saguna Brahman the living entities seek pleasure, happiness and meaning in so many ways. There is joy here, there is happiness, but in time all material pleasures end. As discussed previously this material world is real as are the experiences we have here, but it and they are fleeting. There is no permanence anywhere in the material world.
Eventually all our joys turn to sadness and death as we, like the grasses in the field, fade and die. Then once again, driven by karma, dharma and marga, the soul is reborn in accordance with the dictates of Samsara.
After untold numbers of births and deaths the soul finally realizes that the way to freedom is to escape the prison of the material existence and begins seeking some means to achieve this. The embodied soul joins religious fellowships, reads holy books, meditates, prays prayers and chants mantras, practices various rites and yet continues the process of samsara (rebirth). Now however the soul gradually progressing into lifetimes that are more conducive to spiritual advancement.
Now Sri Krsna advises that through buddhi-yoga the spiritually desirous living entities can at last find release from present and past karmic indebtedness and attain freedom.
Pray For Bhārat Gaṇarājya(India)! Pray For Mumbai!
The Deccan Mujahideen (who are claiming responsibility for these latest attacks) like other Muslim Ummah Revolutionaries are committed to the principles of the Muslim Brotherhood Project (see below after the news story for more info on the Brotherhood). This is not about Pakistan per se however these attacks have the same foundation as the tragic division of India that led to the creation of that Ummah state.
According to the Islamic prophecies India must be "cleansed of all Hindus" and taken into/subjugated by the Islamic Ummah and the rising global caliaphate. All of these Muslim Ummah/Muslim Brotherhood attacks in India have this as their goal.
The Deccan Plateau is in southern India and includes the areas of Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka.
"Mujahideen" is Arabic for "strugglers," ie those who struggle to establish the global Chaliphate.
The Deccan Mujahideen is an Indian branch of the Egyptian based Muslim Brotherhood Project, founded by Sheik Al Bani and now embraced by most Muslim political organizations around the globe. The question for us in the US is what Muslim Brotherhood Project serrogate Barack Husein Obama will do as the Muslim Brotherhood continues to expand its efforts to destroy India, Israel, the UK, the US and other countries.
Mumbai attacks: Who are the Deccan Mujahideen?
Late Wednesday evening, roughly two dozen militants armed with assault rifles and grenades and carrying backpacks full of ammunition came ashore in a rubber dinghy and immediately set about cutting a swath of destruction through the heart of Mumbai's financial and tourist districts. They stole a vehicle and sprayed passerby with bullets en route to a series of coordinated attacks on as many as 10 strategic targets, including the city's largest train station, hospitals, a bustling tourist cafe and two of Mumbai's most popular luxury hotels. Almost 24 hours laters, 125 people are dead and more than 300 injured, and the Indian army has engaged the militants in the Taj hotel and elsewhere in an attempt to save the untold numbers of people trapped or taken hostage inside.
As the carnage unfolded, a relatively unknown terrorist group calling themselves the "Deccan Mujahideen" claimed responsibility. "Muslims in India should not be persecuted. We love this as our country but when our mothers and sisters were being killed, where was everybody?" a militant holed inside the Oberoi hotel told Indian television via telephone. "Release all the mujahideens, and Muslims living in India should not be troubled."
So who are the Deccan Mujahideen? Security analysts and intelligence experts worldwide have been scrambling in the wake of the Mumbai attacks to determine if the heretofore unknown group is affiliated with an existing group or if they are indeed new.
The group's Wikipedia page (yes, they already have a Wikipedia page; the Internet moves fast) lays out the etymology of their name as such:
Deccan refers to the Deccan Plateau in southern India which encompasses the states of Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. The name is an anglicised form of the Prakrit word dakkhin, itself derived from the Sanskrit word dakṣiṇa-, meaning 'South' or 'The South'.
Mujahideen in Arabic literally means "strugglers". However, some terrorist groups, such as Al-Qaeda, carry out terrorist acts under the rubric of "Jihad," meaning "struggle."
But whether the group Deccan Mujahideen is local or foreign, a new group or operating under an assumed name, the undeniable fact is that it is comprised of the Islamic men.
On this last point, most experts agree. There is also general agreement that the nature of the attacks represents a marked departure from other recent terror assaults in India, in which the tactics were cruder, the targets more random. This higher level of sophistication fuelled early speculation of international involvement, and that indeed, the Deccans may be linked to al-Qaeda. From Bloomberg:
“Highly symbolic but soft targets such as fancy hotels and the train station, and the use of synchronized coordinated teams, does show some of the same modus operandi as al-Qaeda- linked attacks in London and Madrid,” said Andrea Plebani, a researcher at Centro Volta, a research institute based in Como, Italy. “But it’s obviously too early to draw any conclusions.”
In an interview with the International Herald Tribune, Christine Fair, senior political scientist and a South Asia expert at the RAND Corporation, also downplayed the al-Qaeda link, as well as suggestions that the group could have been a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba, a brutal Islamist organization based in Pakistan with a significant presence in Kashmir and links to al-Qaeda:
"There's absolutely nothing Al Qaeda-like about it," she said of the attack. "Did you see any suicide bombers? And there are no fingerprints of Lashkar. They don't do hostage-taking and they don't do grenades."
In a blog post for Foreign Policy magazine, editor Blake Hounshell explores the Lashkar connection further, and suggests that the Deccans may even have backing from "rogue elements" within the Pakistani intelligence service:
Here's where it gets interesting -- and I stress here that I am just speculating. Lashkar-e-Taiba's main goal is to expel India from Kashmir. In the past, some have accused elements of the Pakistani military and intelligence services of having ties to the group. Pakistan's government has always hotly denied such accusations.
Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari has in recent weeks moved closer to the United States, made some significant gestures toward India, and moved to shut down the political wing of the ISI, Pakisan's powerful intelligence service (that's the unit that tries to steal elections). How likely is it that some angry "rogue elements" of the ISI, aligned with Kashmiri jihadists and a team of Indian domestic extremists, sought to head off these moves? I have no idea, but it's definitely a theory worth exploring.
In all this, a simpler explanation has emerged. Indian officials have suggested the attackers might just be the latest in a string of attacks by home-grown Indian Islamic militant splinter groups, frustrated by the treatment of Muslims within their own country. The aforementioned Christine Fair says one incident — a "watershed event" — that continues to fuel anger is the riots that swept Gujarat State near Mumbai in 2002, killing between 1,000 and 2,000 people, mostly Muslims.
"There are a lot of very, very angry Muslims in India," she said, "The economic disparities are startling and India has been very slow to publicly embrace its rising Muslim problem. You cannot put lipstick on this pig. This is a major domestic political challenge for India."
The Times of India also writes today that the Deccan attacks have added to the growing belief that India is confronting a surge of home-grown Islamic militancy. They note that while majority of previous attacks over the last year on Indian soil have been blamed on groups based in or directly supported by neighbouring Pakistan, responsibility has increasingly been claimed by groups with names stressing their local origins:
"Deccan Mujahideen," which said it was responsible for the Mumbai assault, takes its title from the Deccan plateau that covers much of south India.
The outfit sent emails to local media saying it carried out the attacks.
A similarly shadowy group calling itself the "Indian Mujahedeen" claimed responsibility for serial blasts in Delhi in September, which killed 20 people, and bombings in Ahmedabad in July when 45 died.
Another group, the "Islamic Security Force-Indian Mujahedeen," said it was behind explosions last month in India's northeast state of Assam that killed 80.
It is unclear whether the various groups are connected, but retired senior security official B. Raman has said their chosen names were a "bid to Indianise" the Islamic militant movement.
This post will be updated as more information becomes available.
Muslim End Time prophecy specifies that the entire Indian subcontinent must be purged of all traces of Hinduism by a jamaat of Muslims prior to the Ummah's genocide of Israel's Jews. Much of India has already been lost to Ummah.
Note how the following NWO propaganda piece links Pakistan (formerly part of India, now part of the Ummah) and India (which is quickly, foolishly, disastrously, being surrendered to the NWO Elite for economic globalization payoffs) with this Kabul attack. Now recall the current moves by the NWO Elite to invade Iran.
The connection/rationale?
Iran is financing the Ummah's presence in the NWO/US puppet state of Afghanistan, the NWO/US influenced Pakistan and elsewhere (despite the Shia/Sunni differences -- so-called "Protestant Islam" is more involved in this harmonization move than is now suspected).
The Ummah and Iran are threatening (promising) to destroy Israel if/when they get the bomb.
The Ummah and Iran will threaten the US mainline if they successfully get the bomb and the means to deliver it.
The Ummah and Pakistan are threatening India (which is embracing the NWO and which, other than Israel and the Saud Royal family, is the only real NWO ally in the region).
The Ummah, Iran and Pakistan are threatening the Afghan US puppet government.
The Ummah, the Iraqi nationalists and Iran are threatening the US occupation of Iraq.
The Solution?
More WAR! More Chaos!
To what end?
For the Muslim Ummah:
The forces of the Muslim Brotherhood Project and the Unified Ummah are marching forward toward their desired global Madhi-based caliphate. The Ummah is not only prepared for but is expecting that global chaos and destruction will be necessary. Part of this chaos, according to the Deen and Ummah of Islam will be the rise of Dijal (aka the Antichrist, Little Horn... the Rex Mundi). They are certain that in the end Allah subhanna wa ta'ala will give them the victory.
The Ummah is ready.
For the New World Order:
The forces of the emerging Illuminati and Bilderberg Novus Ordo Seclorum (the New Secular Order) are marching on toward their desired global corporatorial dictatorship. The economic zones of the Bilderberg New World Order (Novus Ordo Mundi) are now being harmonized. Soon these economic zones will achieve near stasis and the Rex Mundi (Global Ruler) will arise from the EU. He will sign treaties with the Ummah, Communist China, Russia, and others and establish his global Kingdom with the signing of a treaty with Israel. The Illuminati/Bilderberg is not only prepared for but intentionally creating global chaos and destruction. They are certain that in the end Lucifer will give them the victory.
The Illuminati Elite are ready. Are you?
Don't underestimate the seriousness of such attacks.
