Saturday, January 31, 2009
My letter from and to US Senator Dianne Feinstein RE Obama
A few months ago I wrote my US Senator, Dianne Feinstein asking her to block the nomination of B. Hussein Obama due to his Constitutional ineligibility. To my surprise she finally wrote back. First her response, then my reply to her.
Dear The Rev. [John of AllFaith]:
Sincerely yours, Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator
And My reply:
Dear Senator Feinstein,
Thank you for replying. Please consider this reply to your note.
Contrary to what you have said, Mr. Obama does NOT meet the required qualifications to be president of the United States and hence he has no Constitutional authority to hold this office.
As has been thoroughly demonstrated in many places, according to his paternal grandmother, several relatives and the family imam Mr. Obama was born in Mombasa Kenya not Hawaii.
According to his sister he was born in one Hawaiian hospital while he claims he was born in another and to date he still refuses to release his hospital or school records or his COLB (certificate of live birth) that might resolve the issue if he is telling the truth.
Further, Mr. Obama attended the Muslim section of a public school in Indonesia. At that time the government of Indonesia only allowed Indonesian citizens to attend school and they forbade dual citizenship. Mr. Obama's step father, an Indonesian national, adopted him so he could attend the school. By Indonesian law at that time therefore he was an Indonesian citizen by virtue of that adoption and his enrollment in the school provides solid proof of this fact. In order to attend school there he had to relinquish any and all other citizenship and so, even if he was born in the US he would have had to relinquish his US citizenship, thus he is Constitutionally ineligible for the post he currently holds as well as for his former Senate seat.
By allowing Mr. Obama to become president you personally, the US Senate, the US Congress and the US Supreme Court that rejected over 20 cases asking that his eligibility be proved are all guilty of high treason against the United States and its citizens.
With this direct and knowing violation of the Constitution of the United States of America this government has clearly demonstrated its utter disregard for the laws of this nation and for the people of the country.
Sincerely,
~ [John of AllFaith]
Oroville, Ca.
I'll let you know if she writes back!
(If I disappear you'll know why ;-)
senator@feinstein.senate.gov wrote:
Dear The Rev. [John of AllFaith]:
Thank you for writing regarding President Barack Obama's qualifications to be President. I appreciate hearing from you and I apologize for the delay in my response.
Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution specifies the qualifications for this executive office. It states that no person except for a natural born American citizen is eligible to run for President of the United States. Also, the candidate must be at least thirty-five years of age and have resided in the United States for at least fourteen years.
President Obama meets these constitutional requirements. He was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. According to the Fourteenth Amendment, all persons born in the United States are considered citizens of the United States. Under these criteria, President Obama, a 47-year old U.S. citizen, who has resided in the United States for longer than fourteen years, is eligible to be President.
Once again, thank you for writing. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. staff at (202) 224-3841.
United States Senator
And My reply:
Dear Senator Feinstein,
Thank you for replying. Please consider this reply to your note.
Contrary to what you have said, Mr. Obama does NOT meet the required qualifications to be president of the United States and hence he has no Constitutional authority to hold this office.
As has been thoroughly demonstrated in many places, according to his paternal grandmother, several relatives and the family imam Mr. Obama was born in Mombasa Kenya not Hawaii.
According to his sister he was born in one Hawaiian hospital while he claims he was born in another and to date he still refuses to release his hospital or school records or his COLB (certificate of live birth) that might resolve the issue if he is telling the truth.
Further, Mr. Obama attended the Muslim section of a public school in Indonesia. At that time the government of Indonesia only allowed Indonesian citizens to attend school and they forbade dual citizenship. Mr. Obama's step father, an Indonesian national, adopted him so he could attend the school. By Indonesian law at that time therefore he was an Indonesian citizen by virtue of that adoption and his enrollment in the school provides solid proof of this fact. In order to attend school there he had to relinquish any and all other citizenship and so, even if he was born in the US he would have had to relinquish his US citizenship, thus he is Constitutionally ineligible for the post he currently holds as well as for his former Senate seat.
By allowing Mr. Obama to become president you personally, the US Senate, the US Congress and the US Supreme Court that rejected over 20 cases asking that his eligibility be proved are all guilty of high treason against the United States and its citizens.
With this direct and knowing violation of the Constitution of the United States of America this government has clearly demonstrated its utter disregard for the laws of this nation and for the people of the country.
Sincerely,
~ [John of AllFaith]
Oroville, Ca.
I'll let you know if she writes back!
(If I disappear you'll know why ;-)
senator@feinstein.senate.gov wrote:
Dear The Rev. [John of AllFaith]:
Thank you for writing regarding President Barack Obama's qualifications to be President. I appreciate hearing from you and I apologize for the delay in my response.
Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution specifies the qualifications for this executive office. It states that no person except for a natural born American citizen is eligible to run for President of the United States. Also, the candidate must be at least thirty-five years of age and have resided in the United States for at least fourteen years.
President Obama meets these constitutional requirements. He was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. According to the Fourteenth Amendment, all persons born in the United States are considered citizens of the United States. Under these criteria, President Obama, a 47-year old U.S. citizen, who has resided in the United States for longer than fourteen years, is eligible to be President.
Once again, thank you for writing. If you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact my Washington, D.C. staff at (202) 224-3841.
Sincerely yours, Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator
Further information about my position on issues of concern to California and the Nation are available at my website http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/. You can also receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list at http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ENewsletterSignup.Signup.
For more on Obama ineligibility see my: Oct 22, '08 blog entry
Friday, January 30, 2009
Obama Prepares To Turn On Israel with Samantha Power
Obama Prepares To Turn On Israel!
B. Hussein Obama has anointed an avid anti-Semite and hatter of Israel as his senior director for multilateral affairs at the National Security Council. Surprised? You shouldn't be. This appointment will please al Ikhwan to no end.
Ms. Power isn't all bad, she recognized Hillery Clinton for the "monster" she is, but her ideas on Israel and the Jewish people are VERY disturbing.
The following is posted unedited, but the emphasis' are mine.
SOURCE
U.S. SHOULD SEND IN TROOPS TO IMPOSE A SOLUTION ON ISRAEL.
Stand With Israel Against The Globalists!
Stand With Israel Against Caliph B. Hussein Obama!
Stand With Israel Against Caliph B. Hussein Obama!
Thursday, January 29, 2009
God, Faith and the War of Northern Aggression: WARRIORS OF HONOR
WARRIORS OF HONOR
The reason I'm showing this video is probably obvious to most of you who know me.
We Americans have become a weak people largely devoid of faith and unacquainted with toil and suffering. We live as kings and queens and believe we have the right to rule the world when we can't even justly rule ourselves.
But it wasn't always so. There was a time when true patriots stood and defied Government tyranny in this country. Yes they lost the war, but they Stood and refused to accept the boot of tyranny. Will we stand? Time is fast running out.
This full length documentary doesn't focus much on the lies we all have been taught concerning the War of Northern Aggression, other than in its opening remarks. That war is past. Rather it shows us the strength of our ancestors and, more importantly the Source of that strength. That is my point here. The ONLY way we can withstand the New Wold Order is by FAITH. An unyielding faith in GOD that precious few people today have.
Each video is about 10 minutes long. The sixth video -- which concerns the Union Army's sacking and countless abuses in my home town -- is in many ways the most pertinent to what we will soon face. If you don't watch them all I recommend watching at least that one.
"Having done all to stand -- STAND"
We Americans have become a weak people largely devoid of faith and unacquainted with toil and suffering. We live as kings and queens and believe we have the right to rule the world when we can't even justly rule ourselves.
But it wasn't always so. There was a time when true patriots stood and defied Government tyranny in this country. Yes they lost the war, but they Stood and refused to accept the boot of tyranny. Will we stand? Time is fast running out.
This full length documentary doesn't focus much on the lies we all have been taught concerning the War of Northern Aggression, other than in its opening remarks. That war is past. Rather it shows us the strength of our ancestors and, more importantly the Source of that strength. That is my point here. The ONLY way we can withstand the New Wold Order is by FAITH. An unyielding faith in GOD that precious few people today have.
Each video is about 10 minutes long. The sixth video -- which concerns the Union Army's sacking and countless abuses in my home town -- is in many ways the most pertinent to what we will soon face. If you don't watch them all I recommend watching at least that one.
"Having done all to stand -- STAND"
One far worse than General Sherman
is on his way!
is on his way!
WARRIORS OF HONOR ( ROBERT E LEE & STONEWALL JACKSON DOCUMENTARY ) / PART 2 OF 8
WARRIORS OF HONOR ( ROBERT E LEE & STONEWALL JACKSON DOCUMENTARY ) / PART 3 of 8
WARRIORS OF HONOR ( ROBERT E LEE & STONEWALL JACKSON DOCUMENTARY ) / PART 4 OF 8
WARRIORS OF HONOR ( ROBERT E LEE & STONEWALL JACKSON DOCUMENTARY ) / PART 5 OF 8
WARRIORS OF HONOR ( ROBERT E LEE & STONEWALL JACKSON DOCUMENTARY ) / PART 6 OF 8
If you only watch one of these, watch this one!
WARRIORS OF HONOR ( ROBERT E LEE & STONEWALL JACKSON DOCUMENTARY ) / PART 7 OF 8
WARRIORS OF HONOR ( ROBERT E LEE & STONEWALL JACKSON DOCUMENTARY ) / PART 8 OF 8
In the War of Northern Aggression (aka the Civil War or War between the States) there were clear lines drawn. As the first video explains the cultures of the Confederate South and the Union North were very different. In the upcoming War -- regardless of the details of how it comes about and who is involved -- we will have no such clear lines; There will be no Mason-Dixon. There will be chaos.
FEMA has already divided the nation into strategy zones and the absolutely control of "Norcom" is already planned in detail with countless contingency plans ready to be enacted as needed by the New World Order Elite. Traveling between zones will be difficult if not impossible. Resistance will be MUCH more difficult to organize and joining others in resistance groups may be all but impossible if connections have not already been made in advance, depending on where one is when martial law is declared.
Preparedness is key and that means making decisions and plans ahead of time.
At what point would you say enough!
At what point would you rebel?
At what point would you willingly lay down your life rather than submit?
Will you die rather that accept the coming implant?
Will you die rather than submit to the oath of loyalty?
Do you know who you and your family can depend on?
Do know whether or not your pastor, rabbi, priest has already agreed to be a liaison with the DHS (Department of Homeland Security)? Many have, especially in the larger congregations.
It might not be a bad idea to ask yourselves such questions.
Do you have stored food and water?
Do you have access to more food and water? A stream? a forest?
Are you armed with unregistered weapons (weapon confiscation will happen early on as we saw in New Orleans and elsewhere)?
Do you have stored ammo?
Flashlights? First Aid kits? Medicines? Extra eye glasses?
Do you have a generator? Fuel?
It wont be possible to be fully prepared but thinking ahead of time is a VERY good idea.
Having done all to stand
Stand!
The Global Poverty Act: We knew it before the election, now he's doing it!
ELECTION 2008
Obama bill: $845 billion
more for global poverty
Democrat sponsors act OK'd by Senate panel
that would cost 0.7% of gross national product
Posted: February 14, 2008
3:53 pm Eastern
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
 Barak Obam |
Sen. Barack Obama, perhaps giving America a preview of priorities he would pursue if elected president, is rejoicing over the Senate committee passage of a plan that could end up costing taxpayers billions of dollars in an attempt to reduce poverty in other nations.
The bill, called the Global Poverty Act, is the type of legislation, "We can – and must – make … a priority," said Obama, a co-sponsor.
It would demand that the president develop "and implement" a policy to "cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief" and other programs.
When word about what appears to be a massive new spending program started getting out, the reaction was immediate.
"It's not our job to cut global poverty," said one commenter on a Yahoo news forum. "These people need to learn how to fish themselves. If we keep throwing them fish, the fish will rot."
Many Americans were alerted to the legislation by a report from Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media. He published a critique asserting that while the Global Poverty Act sounds nice, the adoption could "result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States" and would make levels "of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."
He said the legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years he said would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends."
The plan passed the House in 2007 "because most members didn't realize what was in it," Kincaid reported. "Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require."
A statement from Obama's office this week noted the support offered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
"With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces," Obama said. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world.
"Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere," he continued.
The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending.
"It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said.
Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable."
Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance."
"In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning 'small arms and light weapons' and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said.
Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims.
Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas.
And the only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," Kincaid writes.
On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed.
"This is disgusting, sickening and angers me to the depths of my soul," the forum author wrote. "Obama wants us to support the world. I wonder how they intend to eliminate poverty. Most of the money always winds up in some dictator hands and in the U.N. coffers."
WND calls to Obama's office, as well as the offices of others who supported the plan, were not successful in obtaining a comment.
Another forum participant said, "Yes, and we should also eliminate sickness of any kind and get rid of poverty as well. Then, too, we should make certain that everyone in the world has equal assets, equal money, a college education, etc… After that, or maybe while we are solving all of the world's little problems, we can take care of the polar bears, eliminate the internal combustion engine, and, and, and… Oh dear, if only we would just go ahead and do all the things the dreamers want us to do. Let's stop using oil and burning coal while we're at it. Then we can make it illegal to be overweight and then we can. ..."
One forum contributor said since the legislation doesn't specifically demand "taxes," but instead leaves the mandatory "implementation" up to the president, "maybe the tooth fairy will leave [this new money] under the president's pillow."
Kincaid reported several more budget-minded senators have put a hold on the legislation "in order to prevent it from being rushed to the floor for a full Senate vote."
The legislation requires the president to do whatever is required to fulfill a strategy that would result in "the elimination of extreme global poverty and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide … who live on less than $1 per day."
It further requires the president not only to accomplish that goal but, "not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this act," to submit a report on "the contributions provided by the United States" toward poverty reduction.
What is the Global Poverty Act?
From Wikipedia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_poverty_act
The Global Poverty Act was a bill in the U.S. Congress. The bill was co-sponsored by 84 representatives and 30 senators.
The Global Poverty Act would require the U.S. President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day. This would require the United States to increase its overall spending on Humanitarian Aid from 23 billion to 98 billion a year. This bill has been surrounded by some controversy because it also has stipulations that could infringe on the Constitution of the United States.
Timeline
- Mar 1, 2007: Introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressman Adam Smith.
- Jul 31, 2007: Scheduled for debate in the House.
- Sep 25, 2007: Passed in the House of Representatives by voice vote.
- Sep 26, 2007: Received in the Senate and read twice; referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
- Feb 13, 2008: Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported with amendments favorably.
- Apr 24 2008: Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Biden with amendments and an amendment to the title. With written report No. 110-331. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders.
Why My Websites Are Down
Well finally my domain(s) server has posted the reason for the crash. As I mentioned, we've been down since last night.
SERVICE STATUS
We regret to advise that one of our servers was recently the victim of a serious hacking attack.
The attack was not successful and our safeguards prevented intrusion however the server's hard drives failed during this process.
We are working non-stop to restore service and are therefore unable to provide customer support at the present time.
If your site was was one of those affected, we apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience and understanding.I'm not sure what this means for my websites, but I guess we'll see.
Till then my graphics here will remain broken.
Obama Worship in the Schools: Wheck out this link!
School kids Complain About Obama Worship
Check out this link
Check out this link
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Why Does the NWO Want to go to Hell Early?
"Why Does the NWO Want to go to Hell Early?"
Some Americans are getting ready to assist them!
Some Americans are getting ready to assist them!
There IS some resistance.
There ARE some Americans willing and ready to STAND.
Meet one of them:
But is it too little too late?
Across the U.S. there are individuals and small groups preparing for war.
Yes, even now!
Most of these people are wisely keeping silent, but they are there.
Some have tanks and planes stored in barns and underground bunkers, many are US veterans who took their pledge to defend the nation seriously...
Some are Christians, some are not...
But is it too late?
Some say no!
Do be aware that I personally have NO PROBLEM agreeing to disagree with good people. If you follow the links and check out this guys other videos you'll find that on some things I agree with him and on some I don't. That's cool. THAT is freedom.
He IS interesting and worthy of a listen!
http://freedomfighterradio.net/
By Jim (host of Freedom Fighter Radio.net)
There are so many things that We The People need to protest. It is clear that changes will not be made until we take a stand. We need protests like that of Martin Luther King Jr. in the 60’s. Like the issues of those days, changes were not made until the American people united in protest. This is that time for us, now. No matter your issue, this is the time to take a stand for what you believe in. If the founders of this nation knew that 200 years down the road the American People would not take a stand to correct the problems that our corrupted, greedy politicians have created they would be ashamed. Don’t let them down!There are many people with differing viewpoints on certain issues but it vitally important to put aside our differences and keep the peace and unite under the banner of Freedom. We need to have a date that we all will connect on the same day against our city halls,court houses,Govt facilities,financial institutions and yes even the Church s who refuse to take a stand and finally last but not least the homes of those elected employees who are Raping America of its’ Freedom and selling it out to the Global elite. Our rally cry should be ” Not No But Hell No”
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
The Image of the Beast And The Four World Empires
Welcome to Thus Says the Prophets!
Welcome to Thus Says the Prophets!
The Image of the Beast
And The Four World Empires
And The Four World Empires
In the case of the image of the Beast described by Prophets Daniel and John the interpretation is crystal clear in my opinion and yet there is still debate and confusion. This study will examine the Image of the Beast and demonstrate from the texts of the prophecies that there is no reference to the United States found in the image. As we are currently watching the prophecies being fulfilled before our very eyes I can only think of one reason for the absence of the United States from the prophecies. I believe we are now witnessing the fall of the American Empire into irrelevance. The EU will soon replace the U.S. in international affairs and from there the Rex Mundi will arise. This event could happen at any time or it may be a few years in the future. Prophetically speaking, all we are waiting for is the signing of a specific treaty with Israel and the rebuilding of the Jerusalem Temple.
Daniel's prophesy:
Daniel 2:
1 And in the second year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar Nebuchadnezzar dreamed dreams, wherewith his spirit was troubled, and his sleep brake from him.
2 Then the king commanded to call the magicians, and the astrologers, and the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans, for to show the king his dreams. So they came and stood before the king.
3 And the king said unto them, I have dreamed a dream, and my spirit was troubled to know the dream.
King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon called his wisest servants and demanded that they reveal not only what his dream meant but the dream itself! Anyone can fabricate an interpretation of a dream but only one inspired by God could reveal both the dream and its interpretation.
There is a very important point here. People often try to identify prophetic characters based on appearances: Ronald Wilson Reagan was thought by some to be the Antichrist because of his name (three series of 6 letters: 666), Hillary Clinton is believed by some to be the Whore of Babylon because she is a politically powerful demon possessed woman. However all such interpretations stand in contradiction to key prophecies and so should not be accepted as accurate. Interpretations must be arrived at carefully and must be based solely on the Word of Prophecy. This would eliminate much confusion.
9 But if ye will not make known unto me the dream, there is but one decree for you: for ye have prepared lying and corrupt words to speak before me, till the time be changed: therefore tell me the dream, and I shall know that ye can show me the interpretation thereof.
10 The Chaldeans answered before the king, and said, There is not a man upon the earth that can show the king's matter: therefore there is no king, lord, nor ruler, that asked such things at any magician, or astrologer, or Chaldean.
11 And it is a rare thing that the king requireth, and there is none other that can show it before the king, except the gods, whose dwelling is not with flesh.
12 For this cause the king was angry and very furious, and commanded to destroy all the wise men of Babylon.
The term "wise men" used here is chakkiym (Aramaic -- "khak-keem"). These were the emperor's consultants. With this act Nebuchadnezzar was rejecting human reasoning. This commitment to discovering the truth is why HaShem chose to reveal these things to him.
13 And the decree went forth that the wise men should be slain; and they sought Daniel and his fellows to be slain.
14 Then Daniel answered with counsel and wisdom to Arioch the captain of the king's guard, which was gone forth to slay the wise men of Babylon:
15 He answered and said to Arioch the king's captain, Why is the decree so hasty from the king? Then Arioch made the thing known to Daniel.
16 Then Daniel went in, and desired of the king that he would give him time, and that he would show the king the interpretation.
17 Then Daniel went to his house, and made the thing known to Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, his companions:
Hananiah (Shadrach), Mishael (Meshach), and Azariah (Abednego), along with Daniel (Belteshazzar) knew that only God can reveal such things. Unlike the other wise men of the kingdom and many of those claiming to reveal truth today who rely on their own intellectual determinations, these holy men sought God's mercy and revelations. Note that these Hebrews sought God's mercy in humility. This is diametrically opposed to the general trend of the modern Laodicean (Nicean/Nicolatian) Church as John foretold at Revelation 3:15-20. As the following information was granted by HaShem due to their requests it is important that we not add to what is said.
18 That they would desire mercies of the God of heaven concerning this secret; that Daniel and his fellows should not perish with the rest of the wise men of Babylon.
19 Then was the secret revealed unto Daniel in a night vision. Then Daniel blessed the God of heaven.
20 Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and might are his:
21 And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding:
22 He revealeth the deep and secret things: he knoweth what is in the darkness, and the light dwelleth with him.
The dream therefore concerns real governments that will be seated in the course of human affairs. Let's skip forward a few verses now. You may wish to read these in your Bible.
27 Daniel answered in the presence of the king, and said, The secret which the king hath demanded cannot the wise men, the astrologers, the magicians, the soothsayers, show unto the king;
28 But there is a God in heaven that revealeth secrets, and maketh known to the king Nebuchadnezzar what shall be in the latter days. Thy dream, and the visions of thy head upon thy bed, are these;
29 As for thee, O king, thy thoughts came into thy mind upon thy bed, what should come to pass hereafter: and he that revealeth secrets maketh known to thee what shall come to pass.
God grants individuals and nations free will; many events and choices can be changed or avoided. The prophecies are not based on predestination as though we were the victims of inescapable fate, but rather are the foretellings of the decisions the involved parties will make and how HaShem will react to those choices. This is very important to understand.
There are two prophecies in effect: one Light the other Dark. We humans are free agents. We choose to submit to God and to the Prophecies of Light or we choose to rebel and embrace the Darkness. Terrans (Earthlings) can change and improve our world or we can drive it into deeper Darkness. AND all such choices are incorporated into the prophecies due to the foreknowledge of God! For God there is no time. God is beyond time. Therefore when the Prophets are shown "what shall come to pass" it is certain to occur.
30 But as for me, this secret is not revealed to me for any wisdom that I have more than any living, but for their sakes that shall make known the interpretation to the king, and that thou mightest know the thoughts of thy heart.
31 Thou, O king, sawest, and behold a great image. This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before thee; and the form thereof was terrible.
The Image of the Beast:
32 This image's head was of fine gold, his breast and his arms of silver, his belly and his thighs of brass,
33 His legs of iron, his feet part of iron and part of clay.
As will be shown below, this image is the personification of the future of world government. Understanding the symbolism of this prophetic image is essential to undercovering the prophetic presentation of the New World Order and its coming master, the Rex Mundi. It also will explain a lot about the future establishment of Moshiach's coming Kingdom as represented by the "stone cut without hands" that will destroy the image and the nations of rebellious humans. Not only does Prophet Daniel reveal this information under divine inspiration, Prophet Y'shua references it and Prophet John expands our knowledge of it (Matt 24:25, Luke 21:24, Rev. 13:14, 14:11, 20:4 etc.).
34 Thou sawest till that a stone was cut out without hands, which smote the image upon his feet that were of iron and clay, and brake them to pieces.
35 Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshingfloors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them: and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth.
36 This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king.
The Interpretation of the Image of the Beast:
Now the meaning of these symbols will be shared. We should accept them as they are without undue interpretation. When we do this, its all quite clear.
37 Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory.
38 And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold.
The Head of the Image: Nebuchadnezzar's Babylonian Empire. We know from the text that the image has to do with empires. We also know that King Nebuchadnezzar is the head and leader of Babylonia. For the rest we will be looking for other empires and rulers that at this point in Daniel's life did not exist.
39 And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.
40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.
Altogether four world empires are presented here. The first of these is Babylon. The other three will be clearly identified below. The fourth of these kingdoms does not actually fall like the earlier three, it divides into separate kingdoms according to the next verses.
41 And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
So we learn here that the first three empires will fall but the fourth will crumble into separate countries. Each of these countries will maintain their individual powers and influences and be at odds with one another. This situation will continue for an unspecified period of time.
And then:
44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
45 Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold; the great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure.
These individual countries will not fall from power until they are destroyed by the Moshiach.
The Four Winds and the Great Sea:
We know from verse 38 cited above that the "head" of the Image of the Beast is the kingdom of Babylon. Daniel identifies all four kingdoms in chapter seven of his book. Again the information comes to us from a dream, this one of Daniel himself:
Daniel 7:1 In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon Daniel had a dream and visions of his head upon his bed: then he wrote the dream, and told the sum of the matters.
2 Daniel spake and said, I saw in my vision by night, and, behold, the four winds of the heaven strove upon the great sea.
The "four winds" striving "upon the great sea" refers to the same influences referenced as the Four Horsemen (of the Apocalypse) at Zechariah 6:2-5 and Revelation 6:1-8. These are:
- White Horse: False prophets, deception, religious hypocrisy
- Red Horse: War
- Black Horse: Famine
- Pale Horse: Death
The "Great Sea" refers to the sea of humanity. This is confirmed at places like Isa. 60:5, Matt. 13:47 and so on. These four influences have been the bane of mankind since the beginning. In his End Time prophecies found in Matthew 24 Prophet Y'shua speaks of the increase in these conditions as the world approaches the end of the age.
We can therefore understand that what follows is another reference to the future of world governance. Human history is the story of how the leaders of the world react to and utilize the four influences of the four winds to craft their affairs. The four superpowers rule over the great sea. Now the identities of these four superpower empires will be revealed:
3 And four great beasts came up from the sea, diverse one from another.
These four superpowers arise from the sea of humanity are likened unto beasts. It is no coincidence that the coming Rex Mundi is referred to by the prophets as "the Beast." His New World Order reign will be the culmination of all human government. Just as King Nebuchadnezzar stood for the first beast (Babylon) so too the Rex Mundi will rule over a global empire.
The Four Superpowers
4 The first was like a lion, and had eagle's wings: I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked, and it was lifted up from the earth, and made stand upon the feet as a man, and a man's heart was given to it.
We know from chapter two (2:37.38) that the first of these "beasts" or powers is Nebuchadnezzar's Babylon. This is varied by Prophet Jeremiah as follows:
- Jeremiah 4:7 The lion is come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the Gentiles is on his way; he is gone forth from his place to make thy land desolate; and thy cities shall be laid waste, without an inhabitant.
and:
25:9: Behold, I will send and take all the families of the north, saith the LORD, and Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, my servant, and will bring them against this land, and against the inhabitants thereof, and against all these nations round about, and will utterly destroy them, and make them an astonishment, and an hissing, and perpetual desolations.
Referring to this, Prophet Y'shua references the Times of the Gentiles:
- Luke 21:24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
These "Times of the Gentiles" began with the destruction of Israel by Nebuchadnezzar's Babylonian forces. From that point there was no independent Israel until 1948 CE. In the days of Prophet Y'shua Israel was a Roman province (Judea). The First Beast roamed the earth therefore just prior to the destruction of Jerusalem and consumed it. Likewise the Fourth Beast will be destroyed shortly after Israel was reborn in 1948. As Prophet Y'shua said about the generation that witnessed Israel's rebirth:
Matthew 24:34 This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.
With the rebirth of Israel in 1948 the Last Days began. With the destruction of Rex Mundi and his New World Order the Times of the Gentiles will close and the Times of Moshiach and his theocratic kingdom will begin. We now continue with Daniel 7 and identifying the Four Beasts.
5 And behold another beast, a second, like to a bear, and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs in the mouth of it between the teeth of it: and they said thus unto it, Arise, devour much flesh.
This is the referenced, "kingdom inferior to thee" at chapter 2:39. Medio-Persia followed Babylon as world superpower. The identity of this second Beast is later confirmed by Daniel where he discusses the victory of Greece (the third power) over the Medio-Persians:
- 8:20: The ram which thou sawest having two horns are the kings of Media and Persia.
The three ribs probably represent the three countries that made up this kingdom: Media, Persia and Babylonia. This kingdom devoured much flesh including Lydia, Babylonia, Egypt and others.
6 After this I beheld, and lo another, like a leopard, which had upon the back of it four wings of a fowl; the beast had also four heads; and dominion was given to it.
This is the third kingdom noted at 2:39. Daniel discuses them more at 8:21:
- And the rough goat is the king of Grecia: and the great horn that is between his eyes is the first king.
And again at 10:20:
Then said he, Knowest thou wherefore I come unto thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come...
Under the reign of Alexander the Great Greece was like a great leopard that moved swiftly and decisively throughout the known world.
7 After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.
The Roman Empire is described this way in chapter two of Daniel:
- 2:40 And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise
41 And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken.
Here in chapter seven we read of the ten horns of the Beast. These "horns" or authorities represent the leadership of the divided kingdoms that Rome disintegrated into.
In the Scriptures horns are often used in this way:
- Deuteronomy 33:17 His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.
John gives us more information:
Rev. 12:3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
Three and a half years into his seven year reign the Fourth Beast, the Rex Mundi, ruler of the coming Global Union, will turn against the woman and her child (the Jews and the Moshiach). I discuss this elsewhere, but for now it is important to understand that the Beast spoken of in Daniel is the same Fourth Beast described by Daniel. Nebuchadnezzar was the ruler of Babylon, Alexander was ruler of Greece and Rex Mundi will be ruler of the Novus Ordo Seclorum once it comes to power. More on this below.
Unlike any other nation in ancient history Rome never fell. It continues to exist today in the royal European (Merovingian) families who control the European Union, the Bavarian Illuminati, the Bilderberg group, the CFR etc. as well as the nation of Vatican City.
8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.
Again, the Fourth Beast never fell. The divided Roman Empire has ruled the world ever since its inception and yet despite the various historical attempts to re-unite the Empire, the countries of Europa never again united (Dan 2:43) although under Adolf Hitler they came close.
But now the European Union has almost finalized this reunification of Rome, thereby preparing the way for Rex Mundi.
The Image of the Beast is described here as a human figure. According to the prophet and history when the Roman Empire "fell" it divided into two "legs." Some people hoping to find a biblical, prophetic reference to the United States believe they find it here. What is meant by this reference to the two legs of the Image?
The decline and fall of the Roman Empire took place over a long period of time and through several battles and intrigues. Space (and probably reader interest) forbids a detailed discussion of these fascinating twists and turns and even Roman scholars do not agree on when the Empire actually finished its collapsed. There are two basic views:
- September 4, 476 CE: This is the date given by Roman historian Edward Gibbon and is widely accepted. According to this view Rome lasted for a thousand years, until a German General in the Roman army named Odoacer deposed emperor Romulus Augustulus (the last western Roman Emperor). This was the end of Imperial Roman control of Western Europa.
- Others date the Fall of Rome to May 29, 1453 when Ottoman Turks, lead by Caliph of Islam Mehmed II Fath El-Istanbul, took Byzantium (Constantinople) destroying the last remnants of the established Empire.
Caliph Mehmed II destroyed the Eastern Roman Empire as Islam sought to and almost succeeded at conquering the world last time, but in the West the Empire lives on still through Vatican City, the Merovingian and other Royal European bloodlines and now the EU. Among these lineages is the San Grael -- the "Holy Blood" -- through which the Rex Mundi has doubtless already taken his birth.
Clearly these are the "two legs" of governmental development foretold by Daniel, the Eastern and Western roman Empire followed by Eastern and Western Europe. The division of Empire contributed to the establishment of the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox patriarchates and the eventual splitting of the Nicean/Nicolatian Church established by Constantine east and west. The tearing down of the Berlin Wall was a major if symbolic sign that Rome was re-emerging in our days. From the restored Roman Empire, the European Union, the Rex Mundi will unite the world into a Global Union.
A few mainly American students of the prophecies believe these "legs" represent Europa and the United States as though the Image of the Beast were striding the Atlantic. It does seem logical to assume that the United States would be directly involved in the fulfillment of the prophecies, however there simply is no scriptural evidence that this is so. As an American I'd love to see my nation mentioned by the biblical prophets but the fact is we're just not there.
The events described by the prophets foretell earth shaking occurrences the likes of which the world has never experienced. Prophet Y'shua describes the seven year tribulation as the most devastating period in world history! Certainly the United States would be right in the middle of such events unless the nation no longer exists as a player when these events come about.
I discuss the events of the final seven years elsewhere. For now I will merely say that the absence of the United States from the prophecies can only foretell our national demise. It seems quite likely that the turmoil accompanying the fall of the United States will empower the final unification of the European and then Global Union over which the Rex Mundi will preside. The Novus Ordo Mundi (New World Order) is the process through which the nations are even now being united. Upon completion of this unification the Novus Order Seclorum (New Secular Order) will be born and the Rex Mundi will take his throne. It may well be the collapse of the United States that brings about the final unification of the EU and their role as leaders of the Western World.
9 I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment was white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne was like the fiery flame, and his wheels as burning fire.
10 A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened.
11 I beheld then because of the voice of the great words which the horn spake: I beheld even till the beast was slain, and his body destroyed, and given to the burning flame.
12 As concerning the rest of the beasts, they had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time.
13 I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.
14 And there was given him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve him: his dominion is an everlasting dominion, which shall not pass away, and his kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
15 I Daniel was grieved in my spirit in the midst of my body, and the visions of my head troubled me.
There are two prophecies at work. As servants of the Most High we are committed to the HaShem and His Moshiach. We will stand as the Beast rises and prayer for the victory of the Jewish people. According to the Prophecies of Light Moshiach will be victorious and will establish his thousand year kingdom.
I discuss this period in some detail in my study: Aftergeddon: The World After Armageddon: Paradise Restored!
- Maranatha!
Moshiach is Coming!
- But until then...
Having done everything to stand... STAND!
You are visitor number...
Who cares, I'm glad YOU'RE here!
Who cares, I'm glad YOU'RE here!
 The Prophets | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
A Very Real New World Order by Chuck Baldwin
During the recent election I made it clear that while I WISH I could support Chuck Baldwin and his Constitution Party I can not because he (and they) favor abandoning Israel to al Ikhwan and I will not support ANYONE who does not support Israel.
BUT LIKE Ron Paul and Bob Barr -- who also support abandoning Israel -- Chuck Baldwin is a VERY insightful man with wisdom this nation needs. Here's a case in point:
A Very Real New World Order
by Chuck Baldwin
January 27, 2009
BUT LIKE Ron Paul and Bob Barr -- who also support abandoning Israel -- Chuck Baldwin is a VERY insightful man with wisdom this nation needs. Here's a case in point:
by Chuck Baldwin
January 27, 2009
It is hard to believe, but a majority of Americans (including Christians and conservatives) seem oblivious to the fact that there is a very real, very legitimate New World Order (NWO) unfolding. In the face of overwhelming evidence, most Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality, they seem unwilling to even remotely entertain the notion.
On one hand, it is understandable that so many Americans would be ignorant of the emerging New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses to report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even "conservative" commentators and talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, or Joe Scarborough refuse to discuss it. And when listeners call these respective programs, these "conservative" hosts usually resort to insulting the caller as being some kind of "conspiracy kook." One host even railed that if anyone questions the government line on 9/11, we should "lock them up and throw away the key." So much for freedom of speech!
This is an area--perhaps the central area--where liberals and conservatives agree: they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who believes that global government (in any form) is evolving. One has to wonder how otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people can be so brain dead when it comes to this issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling their strings, doesn't it?
The list of notable personalities who have openly referenced or called for some kind of global government or New World Order is extremely lengthy. Are all these people "kooks" or "conspiracy nuts"? Why would world leaders--including presidents, secretaries of state, and high government officials; including the media, financial, and political elite--constantly refer to something that doesn't exist? Why would they write about, talk about, or openly promote a New World Order, if there is no such thing?
Many of us recall President George Herbert Walker Bush talking much about an emerging New World Order. For example, in 1989, Bush told the students of Texas A&M University, "Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations."
Later, Bush, Sr. said, "We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order . . .. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders."
Bush, Sr. also said, "What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea--a new world order."
Bush, Sr. further said, "The world can therefore seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order . . ."
What was President G.H.W. Bush talking about, if there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he hallucinating?
England's Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said, "We are all internationalists now, whether we like it or not." He continued saying, "On the eve of a new Millennium we are now in a new world. We need new rules for international co-operation and new ways of organizing our international institutions." He also said, "Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community."
In 1999, Tony Blair said, "Globalization has transformed our economies and our working practices. But globalism is not just economic. It is also a political and security phenomenon."
What is Tony Blair talking about, if there is no emerging New World Order? What does he mean by "a new doctrine of international community"? What does he mean by "new world"? How can one have globalism, which includes "a political and security phenomenon," without creating a New World Order? Is Tony Blair hallucinating?
Likewise, former President George W. Bush penned his signature to the Declaration of Quebec back on April 22, 2001, in which he gave a "commitment to hemispheric integration and national and collective responsibility for improving the economic well-being and security of our people."
By "our people," Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the people of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly reminded us that G.W. Bush "pledged that the United States will 'build a hemispheric family on the basis of a more just and democratic international order.'"
Remember, too, that it was G.W. Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United States to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is nothing more than a precursor to the North American Community or Union, as outlined in CFR member Robert Pastor's manual, "Toward a North American Community."
If there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order, what was G.W. Bush talking about when he referred to "a hemispheric family" and an "international order"?
The public statements of notable world leaders regarding an emerging New World Order are copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman, Walter Cronkite.
In his book, "A Reporter's Life," Walter Cronkite said, "A system of world order--preferably a system of world government--is mandatory. The proud nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and their own survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . ." Cronkite told BBC newsman Tim Sebastian, "I think we are realizing that we are going to have to have an international rule of law." He added, "We need not only an executive to make international law, but we need the military forces to enforce that law." Cronkite also said, "American people are going to begin to realize that perhaps they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an international body to enforce world law."
If there is no emerging New World Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking about? Can there be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global government? Absolutely not!
Now, when Bush, Sr. talks about fulfilling "the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders," he was talking about the same thing former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he said, "The time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed."
The United Nations has been on the forefront of promoting the New World Order agenda since its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual entitled, "Our Global Neighborhood." It states, "Population, consumption, technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management calls for a systematic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development, which has been the central lesson from the mounting ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global governance."
If there is no emerging New World Order, what is "global governance" all about?
"Who are the movers and shakers promoting global government?" you ask. Obviously, it is the international bankers who are the heavyweights behind the push for global government. Remember, one cannot create a "global economy" without a global government to manage, oversee, and control it.
In a letter written to Colonel E. Mandell House, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."
"Old Hickory" did his best to rid the United States from the death grip that the international bankers were beginning to exert on this country. He may have been the last President to actually oppose the bankers. In discussing the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, Jackson said, "Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out."
Unfortunately, the international bankers proved themselves to be too formidable for President Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration of President Woodrow Wilson, the bankers were given charge over America's financial system by the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Ever since the CFR and Trilateral Commission were created, they have filled the key leadership positions of government, big media, and of course, the Federal Reserve.
In his book, "With No Apologies," former Republican Presidential nominee Barry Goldwater wrote, "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power-- political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future." Was Goldwater a prophet or what?
And again, the goals of the global elite have been publicly stated. Back in 1991, the founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major media for their complicity in helping to facilitate the globalist agenda by saying, "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
How could Rockefeller be any plainer? He acknowledged the willful assistance of the major media in helping to keep the elitists' agenda of global government from the American people. To this day, the major media has not deviated from that collaboration. And this includes the aforementioned "conservative" talking heads. They know if they want to keep their jobs, they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO, more than anything else, is the "Third Rail" to the national media.
Is it any wonder that President Barack Obama has stacked his government with numerous members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet Napolitano, Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle. Other CFR members include CFR President Richard Haass, CFR Director Richard Holbrooke, and founding member of the Trilateral Commission and CFR member Paul Volcker. Obama even asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to deliver the inaugural prayer.
Still not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what he thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, "I think his task will be develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It's a great opportunity; it isn't just a crisis."
This is the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991, "Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Even Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world government. In his column he said, "I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.
"A 'world government' would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.
"So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might."
Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government is plausible.
Do you now see why it does not matter to a tinker's dam whether it is a Republican or Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? For the most part, both major parties in Washington, D.C., have been under the dominating influence of the international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also why it does not matter whether one calls himself conservative or liberal. For the most part, both conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., are facilitating the emerging New World Order. It is time we wake up to this reality.
Presidents Bush, Sr., Bill Clinton, and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the table for the implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in the east. All Obama has to do is put the food on the table--and you can count on this: Barack Obama will serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot believe!
That a New World Order is emerging is not in question. The only question is, What will freedom-loving Americans do about it? Of course, the first thing they have to do is admit that an emerging New World Order exists! Until conservatives, Christians, pastors, constitutionalists, and others who care about a sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the reality of an emerging New World Order, they will be incapable of opposing it. And right now, that is exactly what they are not doing.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/donate.php
© Chuck Baldwin
This column is archived as http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2009/cbarchive_20090127.html
Political Words of Wisdom
This could be fun and informative.
Following is a list of words of political wisdom I've gathered from various sources. They are posted on my website: http://www.allfaith.com/prophecy/politicalwisdom.html
Do you have others to add?
My previous post was on New World Order Quotes. I invite you to add to both lists in the comments section below. If possible, please give the source info if you know it. If not, that's OK I'll try and find it if I add your quote to my website lists.
Gathered by John of AllFaith
Following is a list of words of political wisdom I've gathered from various sources. They are posted on my website: http://www.allfaith.com/prophecy/politicalwisdom.html
Do you have others to add?
My previous post was on New World Order Quotes. I invite you to add to both lists in the comments section below. If possible, please give the source info if you know it. If not, that's OK I'll try and find it if I add your quote to my website lists.
Welcome to Thus Says the Prophets!
Welcome to Thus Says the Prophets!
Political Wisdom
Yes, there actually is some
Yes, there actually is some
"To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical. -- Thomas Jefferson
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered" -- Thomas Jefferson said in 1802
A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate -- Thomas Jefferson, Rights of British America, 1774
A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785
All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression -- Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801
And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever -- Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 18, 1781
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to a Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association, Connecticut, January 1, 1802
Cherish, therefore, the spirit of our people, and keep alive their attention. Do not be too severe upon their errors, but reclaim them by enlightening them. If once they become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress, and Assemblies, Judges, and Governors, shall all become wolves -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle -- Thomas Jefferson, First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801
Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories -- Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 14, 1781
Give up money, give up fame, give up science, give the earth itself and all it contains rather than do an immoral act. And never suppose that in any possible situation, or under any circumstances, it is best for you to do a dishonorable thing, however slightly so it may appear to you... From the practice of the purest virtue, you may be assured you will derive the most sublime comforts in every moment of life, and in the moment of death -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785
Honor, justice, and humanity, forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them if we basely entail hereditary bondage on them -- Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of the Causes and Necessities of Taking up Arms, July 6, 1775
I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with religious institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises. This results not only from the provision that no law shall be made respecting the establishment or free exercise of religion, but from that also which reserves to the States the powers not delegated to the United States. Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious exercise or to assume authority in any religious discipline has been delegated to the General Government. It must then rest with the States -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Samuel Miller, January 23, 1808
I have been happy... in believing that... whatever follies we may be led into as to foreign nations, we shall never give up our Union, the last anchor of our hope, and that alone which is to prevent this heavenly country from becoming an arena of gladiators -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Elbridge Gerry, May 13, 1797
I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Benjamin Rush, September 23, 1800
I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves; and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education. This is the true corrective of abuses of constitutional power -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Charles Jarvis, September 28, 1820
I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary, too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious -- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Ludlow, September 6, 1824
Know of Other Good Quotes? Send them HERE (with whatever source info you have)
Send them HERE (with whatever source info you have)
For more on this topic visit my Thus Sayeth the Prophets website. For further information on the Image of the Beast Click Here.
You are visitor number...
Who cares, I'm glad YOU'RE here!
Who cares, I'm glad YOU'RE here!
 The Prophets | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)